Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, INSTITUTE OF BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES, PUNJAB, LAHORE

4, 5 and 6 removal from employment The public servant was charged with misconduct in the department, but due to material misconduct in the proceedings, the civil servant was removed from the job and was given a personal hearing and Opportunity was not given for the offer. Explanation of the recommendation of the authorized officer, which was the basic and unavoidable requirement of the rules in the departmental proceedings, was not given to the civil servant to have the appropriate opportunity to present his case before the authorized officer. The first was when the showcase notice was issued and the second when the 'authorized officer' sent his recommendations to the authority, which was a clear violation of R6 (3) and (4) of the Rules of Discipline and Discipline, 1975. `Authorized officer \ and part of appellate authority held, department action unsuccessful family advocate from Patoki lawyer