MUHAMMAD RIAZ KHAN versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, PASRUR
The material available on section 12 (3) compulsory retirement record records shows that the appellant was retired on the basis of unsatisfactory record of service and the committee constituted to review the affairs of such employees. On recommendation who qualified for 25 years of service for pensions and other benefits. Although confidential reports were blurred for three years, there were no supporting documents that reported negative comments. At the same time, the record of the appellant remained impeccable until the date of his compulsory retirement; all such matters led to unintended consequences. It would be utter injustice for a person to be mistreated by a bad record of peace service, the retirement order was set aside and the appellant was reinstated in the job because he never retired.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
