Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

TAJ MUHAMMAD versus MOHSIN ALI


Sections 25A & 38 (5) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the contempt of court Act (XLIV of 1976), the Section 3 humiliating argument by the applicants that the respondents failed to comply with the tribunal order and the contempt court law, Prayed for action under the 1976 Order. The tribunal was not complied with because the respondents filed a constitutional petition challenging the decision of the tribunal and the matter was pending before the High Court and the order of the tribunal was stayed. It was not appropriate to start proceedings under the Act.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.