Find a Lawyer

ALI AKBAR versus SINDH LABOUR COURT NO. IV

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Request for a Complaint filed by the Appellant Employee for Regular Position as a Permanent Employee and Provides Benefits to Permanent Employees That Resist to the Request that No Complaint Notice Be Taken And this appellant is not his. Employee records prove that the appellant served the complainant with a notice of complaint through a registered post but it is deemed to have received the notice by the respondent in favor of the recipient without confession. The general manager also did not come to the witness box to deny the receipt of the notice, as for defendant's argument that the appellant was not his employer, all the documents have proved that the appellant only served until 1986 or early 1987. Worked permanently as a worker and there was no evidence that he was a respondent's employee. Subsequently, the rights which he allegedly made to the appellant in 1986 or 1987, cannot be enforced through the complaint notice and the complaint filed in 1989, for three months before the notice of the complainant was served. Could not request a complaint even though the defendant was not employed. Requests dismissed in circumstances best law firm from Gari Habibullah lawyer