Find a Lawyer

ALTAF HUSSAIN versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS SUKKUR

Pakistan Railway Personnel Manual R601 (6) seniority appellant was appointed as a signaller, Grade I was selected for the station master's qualifying course which successfully qualified the appellant, because The certification was already made by the defendant who joined as a signal appellant. Given the seniority in the station master's group, not from the date of actual confirmation, but from the date of appointment to the station master's group, and therefore the defendant was kept inferior. Was nominated for a P2 course. Due to this sanity, the appellant's nomination was later withdrawn by the officials but the appellant completed the course after obtaining a stand order from the civil court and then joined the duties of the plaintiff as station master. Then the applicant's sanity will be reformed. The appellant's divisional personal officer at the hearing modified and appellant's appellant's sanity, his original sanity was first certified as a signaller compared to appellant's respondents and the assistant station master was selected for the qualifying course. Under which the seniority decision was to be made after selecting the appellant for conducting the P2 course and after the affected hearing was passed by the competent authority. The parties but the general manager's dismissal order said that sanity was granted without the hearing of the appellant, which is in violation of the principles of natural justice. After giving the show cause notice to the appellant, the final order was approved by the Divisional Personal Officer. ask a advocate free from Kakul lawyer