MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus MANAGER, JUBILEE SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD., KARACHI
He was charged with the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 Section O12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25 for some acts of corruption on the dismissal of the Appellant and As a result, he was fired. Domestic inquiries in which he allegedly did not attend to take notice were sent on 18 11 1986 to participate in the inquiry, but the appellant stated that he had to cross-examine in front of the Labor Court. He received the notice on 20 20 1986. Inquiries were received on time. The appellant further alleged that he had gone to participate in the inquiry on 18 11 1986 but was stopped at the gate by the watchman and was not allowed to enter. Such a statement dismissed the appellant's position taken in his complaint request. Appellant also admitted that he did not complain about preventing the Labor Department from participating in the inquiry "There was nothing on record to show, that Appellant wrote to the Inquiry Officer or the Administrative Appellant. As such a complaint was sent but several opportunities were provided for him to participate in the inquiry process but he failed to take advantage of them without any reason, the evidence against the appellant fully involved and proved it. Unable to attend inquiry despite allegations against him, numerous opportunities and notices I was just living appeal a previous order that the inquiry can not be ordered on the grounds of dismissal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
