MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB,LAHORE
R 4 (a) (i) Censor Appellant, Deputy Superintendent of Police has been prosecuted against the department under competent authority. The Commissioner has a very poor image of his integrity and he is appalled that such behavior on his part can lead to unpleasant events, based on the inquiry officer's finding, censored the appellant. The appellant's challenge to the censorship order was challenged, indicating that the inquiry officer relied primarily on the evidence. Star Prosecution witnesses such as Section P, AC and DC and they answered the questions posed by the Inquiry Officer in combination with the integrity of the appellant's performance. Not only did the appellant never receive any notice of his integrity during his entire service. Career from 1961 to 1988 but in 1985 his integrity was declared a decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
