ALTAF ANSARI versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, RAILWAYS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Railway Act (IX of 1890), Section 120/121 Pakistan Railway Staff Manual, Vo1 IR 337 Manual for Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Backwards Benefits Petitioner, was removed from the job However, in handling his foreman, the Labor Court again denied jobs that denied benefits for the reason that there was no prevention of unemployment during the intervention and the Labor Court. The decision was affirmed by the Labor Appellate Tribunal Petitioner for payment of the return received. Taking advantage of the fact that under the Rule 337 of the Pakistan Railway Personal Manual, the first rule, they were misunderstood as the aforesaid rules intended to submit the income certificate as per the incident through five non-judicial stamp papers. Was. The authority was not presented, nor was there any concrete effect on the matter before the Labor Court's ruling, even though the unthinkable petition also suffered lapses and for a long delay of 4/2 years. No satisfactory explanation was presented, the petition was dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
