MORACFCO INDUSTRIES LTD. versus MUHAMMAD YAQOOB
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Service Respondents' services were terminated and their complaint request for termination of employment was accepted by the Labor Court. Employers challenged the appeal through a Labor Court order, which was pending with the Labor Appellate Tribunal employers, as well as hearing with the applicants for suspension appeals. The Labor Court ordered the Labor Appellate Tribunal to reimburse workers for benefits that may not be paid by employers during the approval of the appeal, but by employers requesting a stay against the re-warning of services. It was denied that the respondents were willing to receive the money from the date of the order of the Labor Court till the decision of the appeal but during this period the defendants were refused to be re-served.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Mardan lawyer