TAHIR versus AHMAD BAKHSH
The appeal for dismissal of the Civil Code 1908A XLI, R, 1 and 5 115 decree and copies of the judgment on the basis of a disagreement, was almost five years after its appearance in the appellant's request of the court when The appeal was presented to the court along with the required documents and it was also noted that the court was paying attention to affixing the copy of the decree to the court with the complaint of the two appellants along with the court fee. To inquire how such documents were deleted from the file and their appeal removed because the required documentation An inquiry was necessary to find out the fact that it was not with Zat because without it the appeal could not be dismissed. Thus, the High Court could not set down the order and order of the court. In the matter of inquiry, Removal of required documents and decision of appeal on the basis of law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer