Find a Lawyer

^.LUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, PASRUR versus COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER

Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OXXXX, RR1 & 2 Gratis and Group Insurance, the defendant's father was employed by the applicant and on his death Subsequently, the respondents moved the request for recovery of the grant and the group insurance application was contested by the applicant / employer in which the Compensation Commissioner objected to maintaining the application and understanding the jurisdiction which further related to the case. The petitioner filed a constitutional petition before the High Court which gave the defendant premature notice. Research and the action pending before the Commissioner. The applicant claimed that despite the order issued by the High Court, the Commissioner proceeded to accept the petition filed by the former party responsible against the applicant and a notice was issued to pay the applicant. The respondent stated that the order was not brought to the notice of notice or appeared in the service of the Commissioner. , Respondents contend that o rder was not brought to notice but did not result in any provision even if the order issued by the High Court dismissed the provisional injunction and its sanction served this order. Which were all actions taken by the defendant after the issuance of the stand order. Non-durable, ignorant and dishonestly dismissed in the eyes of the law and is considered a pending matter before the Commissioner for final hearing and decision. best advocate from Chacklala lawyer