MUHAMMAD ALI versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, section 47, was absent from the restoration applicant and later on when he wanted to resume duty, he was not allowed to join and the petitioner was dismissed and then he joined duty but section 47 , Had filed an application under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, for the declaration to be considered in his service, which was rejected by the Labor Appellate Tribunal with no jurisdiction, the applicant accepted the reappointment without objection. And because of his own conduct he demanded that he be more than one The service is good. In the constitutional petition, the year in which the applicant on the one hand made the applicant's dismissal order not challenged, and on the other hand, when he consented to the reappointment, he was entitled to arbitration. Will not make Relief in constitutional application
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
