Section O15 (3) was dismissed as a driver on the appellant bus on duty and was on duty when he was returning the bus after his last trip to the terminal and raided the checking squad which found that some passengers were traveling on the bus. The appellant also used some harsh words with the checking squad appellant after the domestic inquiry was dismissed by the Inquiry Officer's authorized authority. And it cannot be said that the appellant's case is standing as a dismissal appellant. Only abused the checking squad but told them to do whatever they wanted because they were not intimidated by any report and refused to sign the TT40, the appellant also admitted that Participated in the inquiry and was signed on every page of the inquiry. , The appellant's misconduct was proved by evidence and his act was a waste of nerve-racking and discipline.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
