Find a Lawyer

GENERAL MANAGER, FEDERAL DIRECTORATE OF FERTILIZER versus NOOR ALAM

Section 2 (1) (n) and 30 compensation employee died due to an accident while paying their duties and his father claimed compensation The employer claimed that the employee is on a daily wage basis and the department 2 (1) (n). The Employer's Compensation Act employer's witness confessed that he had not brought the relevant record to show that the deceased was on a daily wage and his daily wages were relevant records show the status of the deceased and His wages were in the possession of the employer and his unpaid wages were estimated against the deceased, a tele-clerk who was employed in connection with the loading and unloading and handling of imported fertilizers, and during this process the accident occurred. Wind, the deceased was presented under the definition of 'labor' given under section 2 (1) n of the laborers. ens Comp Compensation Act was held, because there was no credible evidence provided by the employer that the deceased's job was modest or that he was deducting more than Rs 1,500 monthly wages; he was a \ artisan \ Intel was when you need a advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer