Find a Lawyer

DISTRICT MANAGER, KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus MUHAMMAD YUNUS

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Retirement Worker Retirement Age Corporation Retired Given the Age of 58 Years The Worker's Appeal for Appointment was disclosed by Workman claiming that he was 58 years old. And thus was mistakenly registered. In his service book and did not sign his request for an appointment, he further claimed that his date of birth was one that was submitted to the national identity card which he submitted to the Labor Court facts. Earlier, it was clear that before the retirement order was passed, the employees had been presented to the dispute employer because there was no evidence of the authenticity of their age entered in the service record. An inquiry to show the employer has heard the employee or to detect his age before passing the retirement order Was dry, the decision was taken by the employer retirement. The principles of natural justice were not heard as a worker and their case was not considered and the authenticity of the original applicant was not specifically verified or substantiated in view of the fact. It was stated that the worker denied his signature stating that the Labor Court's date of birth order on the job restoration had been retained and that the employer had been given the option if he was after notice and Retired after his investigation. It was found by the competent authority that he had reached the age of instability. list of supreme court advocates from Khanqah Dogran lawyer