F. NAJMUDDIN QADRI versus DISTRICT MANAGER, KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O15 (1) (ii) Termination of Employment Some employees are charged with or underpaid additional pay and attendance allowance. The amount of the loan worker's debt owed was due to all errors / commissions allegedly caused by the appellant due to negligence and negligence, fraud and dishonesty. Such an allegation of negligence and negligence was not such misconduct as falls under section O15 (1). (ii), there was no evidence relating to the fraud and dishonesty convicted of the dismissal, there was no evidence to show that the appellant stated that he had any harm to the employer. And acts with the intent of harming and harming workers or deceiving the employer. Appellant was working as a junior ledger keeper in grade five, but he was hired as an Accounts Clerk, Grade VII, and for this reason it is possible for Natora to be appointed when he is assigned to a senior position. So he could make mistakes. Otherwise there was no evidence of any motivation, deception and dishonesty that could be attributed to it. Such actions shall not constitute misconduct as set forth in Section O15 (3) and the termination of employment cannot be guaranteed and the penalties may be extremely high. An order of dismissal was set aside under section O15 (1) and the appellant was ordered to be reinstated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Sangla Hill lawyer