Sections (83 (b), (68 (d), (38 ()) & 69) and illegal practice presiding officer for the election of the Member Provincial Assembly for the election of Election, the effect of the Election Tribunal, the applicant's jurisdiction. Option was that the candidate returned by the Presiding Officer was increased. The Presiding Officer did not mention the applicant's name in the counting statement and he was unaware of who contested the election from a particular constituency. It did not provide details on the counting statement. The Siding Officer was obliged to show the number of legitimate votes in which not all contesting candidates and ballot papers were excluded from the count. The counting in the counting was on record as the petition proved that he had Ling Station Retired Candidate, who received not just 8 votes but 8 votes from a specific PO, committed an illegal act because of the Presiding Officer's illegal assistance in advancing his election because the Election Tribunal had satisfied There is an option to revoke the selection of a retired candidate. Exercise was done by the said candidate or his election agent or by any other person who had a record between the presiding officer and the returning candidate in association with the candidate or his election agent, the selection of the returning candidate was void. Was given and the applicant was the runner. The same election was announced as the return candidate
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
