Section 13 (d) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 439 and 537 of unlicensed weapon evidence failed to scrutinize the evidence filed before the trial court by the trial court as well as the appellate court's testimony. The review was the court's jurisdiction. To remedy the error caused by non-reading, misrepresentation of evidence, or where the court below failed to exercise their jurisdiction while reviewing judicial powers while sitting on the amendment. The legal error can be corrected if the evidence is gone and the evidence included in the investigation. Under Section 373737 by the High Court, the primary responsibility of the court was to exercise its powers and powers when the facts sought by the court for its advice were brought to the court, so that the unreasonable injustice was justified. Can always use its power to prevent or prevent gross abortion. There was considerable skepticism in the present case, which went back to the root of the case in which the accused was already known to the complainant, but the FIR did not show any mention of it in the case. The evidence was contradictory. The story seemed to be fictitious and patent apparently the story of the accused involved. And at the trial, there was an attempt to support a story that couldn't stand at his feet. Because the prosecution's evidence was not convincing, and was not free of reasonable suspicion, despite the gathering of several persons at the scene of the incident and arrest, the counselor used the suspect's account of his village.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
