WASEEM AHMED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Sections 2 (37) and 33 (Clause 13) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Supply Chain Fake / Flight Receipts Tax fraud FI registration and each supplier guilty of a series is considered separate Relations between the suppliers The supply chain FI Rupees were filed against the applicants for committing tax fraud, the applicants demanded the recovery of FI rupees through the current constitutional petition, which is the basic requirement, ie. Officers were not met, establishing supply chains related to rigor and neutrality. Things were still going on either this exercise was not done at all or was done in a difficult way, apparently the tax directorate officials were misunderstood that once there was tax fraud on the supply chain. Is. Or continuous blocks in the supply chain), then all the suppliers in that supply chain were guilty, that is, the fraud direct tax officers tried to spread the investigation to all those in the supply chain who were trying to commit a fraud. This approach was clearly wrong and fundamentally wrong because the supply chain map was established rather than linked. The link and to determine if there is a defect virtual at any point in relation to a particular block (in the supply chain), the officers proceeded seamlessly, with no contact or link to the appropriate commitment of the supply chain. Jumped from person to person. Can't jump when a supply chain moves forward (link by link, unlink each block
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
