Attempts to commit Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337 A (ii), 337 H (2), 337 F (i), 147, 148 and 504, which led to Shi I Madihah, hurrying or neglect, causing dementia, rioting, deadly weapons riots, intentionally insulting with intent to breach the security guarantee, acceptance of further inquiry principles is a fact that no offense Article 497 (1) of the prohibition clause. CCP, this does not mean that it has become a guaranteed offense; the accused, involved in any crime, having the discretion to refuse, to grant bail or denial, to the court, The question had to be temporarily tested. In appropriate cases, discretion may be exercised in favor of the accused, where there was sufficient grounds for further investigation of the accused's guilt. In the present case, the accused, according to the FIR, has suffered a sharp blow to the prosecution's witness. In the medical certificate, the injury to the witness was caused by a stiff and two-pronged weapon. Such a discrepancy between the medical and oral accounts of the case appears to be unconfirmed, and the further investigation involves the accused. Will bring a lawsuit against. The injured prosecution witness was not accused of being repeated, who had earlier demanded an investigation, the accused was on the same issue with the accused, who was granted bail, a continuance case was applied in this case, , Was punishable by up to five years, and did not fall under Article 497 (1), the CRPC prohibition clause, in which case, the sanction of the accused's bail was a tenable principle, unless there were some exceptional circumstances. Available for justification
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
