N.A.A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS versus KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION
Article 199 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 2 (a) General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24 The obligation to retain a constitutional plea The alternative action is to withdraw an assignment order, argue the requirements There was no reason. The notice was neither issued nor given any opportunity for a hearing. The Assignment Responding Authority had withdrew the assignment order at the time but it was not canceled or canceled, nor was any other person or firm given the job of articles, nor was there any financial loss assigned to the applicants. Withdrawal of orders, applicants are entitled to a due date up to the effective date of the termination of any assigned order in accordance with the terms of the agreement between the parties to the termination of any assigned order. It was not necessary to issue a notice of reason or to provide the other party with an opportunity to be heard in the contract. The need to issue a showcase notice or the opportunity for a hearing will arise when any disciplinary or disciplinary action is required. An authority, designation, or person is given the authority to direct, under an order or under any law. As far as the necessary or appropriate respondents are to give reasons for such an order or directive, while issuing an anonymous letter did not act as an authority, office or person under any law, but is a consultant in a contract And did not act unfairly or unfairly. Disputes arising out of any contract and contractual obligations cannot be resolved through a constitutional petition and the arbitrator and the supporter of the arbitration agreement
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
