Sections 200, 202 and 203 of the Complaint, the recording of the complaint, were merely a statement of the law's allegation of failure to present the details of the incident, which does not automatically mean that what was later stated in the case He was false or baseless. Specific form was set out in the law so that criminal law could be brought under a complaint under section 200, a compulsory requirement of CR PC. And the complainant would sign through Section 200, the CCP made it clear that the complainant's investigation could only be successful, and not before taking the information, because it was an act that must be acknowledged after the law. was not. That a direct complaint should be received by the court upon receipt of a direct complaint. If a case initially arises, the court may review it after the complainant has been examined on oath. And if no such case is presented, the court may dismiss the same private complaint at an early stage under section 203, 204, the CC accused may also be acquitted, and the private complaint by the sessions court. Can be excluded at any stage. Section 200, the provisions of the CRPC case, are not obligatory in any way to record the evidence of the complaint to the court, despite the fact that the allegations in the complaint will not prove guilt, or the act in which the complaint was made That was not a crime. According to the provisions of Section 202, the PCP was enforcing the provisions and it is not necessary for the court to dismiss the complaint under Section 203, CCPC, if the reason for doing so is to briefly record the proceedings. Foundations not available.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014