Section 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition for restoration of marriage reputation and marital rights Sue Taluk and Rojo Condition Wife filed suit against marital jurisdiction while husband filed suit for restoration of marital rights, Both suits were stable and the decision of his suit wife was pronounced while the husband was given an abusive divorce, and the engagement of two virtuous as witnesses to juju was a prerequisite for the same husband who His wife was pronounced "divorced" but no witness was produced. Divorce divorce Syedla's divorce allegedly was dismissed by the husband and he returned a `return ', but none of his witnesses were presented in the affidavit of" Rizo "after a dispute with his wife. He was not brought to the notice of the wife afterwards. Second marriage of Aadith was contracted. After the expiry of the Aditya period, the present case was filed by the husband. Alyssand had never contacted his wife during the period. But the wife had a shameful attitude. The alleged attempt by the husband regarding juju was not enough for the wife to have enough to break the bond between the wife and her other husband or separate the children from their parents. Had properly appreciated the evidence presented by the parties. No misreading or reading of evidence or any legal impairment was indicated in the controversial decisions that the constitutional application would be spent on the sum of Rs. 10,000 / and dismissed. r to n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
