Section 115 High Court was unable to find the facts of the two courts below using the scope of the High Court's amended jurisdiction, if it was satisfied that these findings would not read false statements or evidence. Based on The following courts made an error in the mode in which the High Court sought interference with the exercise of their jurisdiction, then the High Court had the power to intervene under Section 115, the CPC trial court legal obligation. It was hard to see the realistic controversy involved. Matter But, in the present case, no attempt was made by the trial court to resolve such dispute. The appellate court should have exercised its inherent jurisdiction, but the appellate court has only in its merits The trial court's decision was upheld without proceeding. Not a single word was uttered until the point of view of the matter and the limitation was accepted and the decisions and orders of the courts below, due to lack of proper definition of evidence and the prosecution of the case, were set aside. went
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
