Definition of evidence in Section 9 (c) drug possession and trafficking: Prosecutor failed to prove any association of two female accomplices with male female accused, who were convicted and both accused were convicted and It was said that the female accomplices were from different places. The female co-accused was 70 years old, while the other was 21 years old, even in his statements under section 342, the CRPC had dismissed that both co-accused women were on the car for their treatment in Rawalpindi. They were riding, they did not recover. The seizure and defects were recovered from the rear seat and the car's secret cavity prosecution failed to prove that it was said that the accomplices knew about the drugs, or from the day before their arrest. Was revealed. He was a passenger, and had no connection, either with the male suspects, or the vehicle used in the crime if the accomplices thought the prohibition was open, or they knew his place in the secret palm. Would have created the situation. Various prosecutions easily proved the presence of the accused (women) in the vehicle. And the mere presence of the accused in the vehicle will not involve them in the case. The prosecution failed to prove their case against the female accomplices, their appeal was granted, in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
