Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN versus RAHIM BAKHSH


Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 15 (2) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A and 38 (3a) withdrew on charges of corruption but reinstated by the Labor Court. Gone, which can be a result of a fresh employer inquiry. Benefits plea denied that the worker had failed to participate in the latest inquiry, so the inquiry could not be completed as it was the employer's duty to pay the wages to the Record of Authority and the Labor Court order. Also complete inquiry based on the content brought. The Labor Appellate Tribunal amended the law, permitting wages representing the privileges returning to the Act, 1936

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Bhara Kahu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.