SAFAR ALI versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), termination of Section O12 job services was terminated on the grounds that the employee's post was terminated due to financial loss. , Documentary evidence was not presented. The employer, however, claimed to terminate the post by the employee, to compensate for the alleged financial losses, however, claiming that the employee's services were terminated as a spinning sack on which the employee worked. Granted, the employer could not prove the fact that the accounts were spinning. Documentary evidence, even if the spinning work was leased out, could be no basis for termination of the employees working in that area, as the employer's change in labor was bad. Were not affected and where the work was leased. Outside, workers had the right to work under a lease when existing workers were not willing to accept services, such workers could be terminated by their consent by paying service benefits, but their wishes. Unlike, their services could not be terminated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer