MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus MANAGER, COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LTD., MULTAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A & 38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Sections OVs 11, 11A, 12 & 13 for the suspension of service suspension application No written order was available stating the obvious reasons for the panchayat account being closed due to factory closure with the permission of the Labor Court for the purpose of eliminating up-to-date benefits, on the employee's statement that he was retired from the job after his termination. The Labor Court is not rejected, it is believed that no written order has been approved. And was awarded restoration with back benefits
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Khushab lawyer
