Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KASIM versus BUILDERS INCORPORATED

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX temporarily requests injunctions and interlocutory orders OXXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 for specific performance of a sale agreement in relation to a plot in the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 suit. Until final settlement, the defendants or other persons acting on their behalf are prohibited from selling, transferring, defacing, marketing or separating the possession of the plot in the suit and are still in possession of the plot and the defendants. No documentation was submitted by them despite claims from. The plot was not transferred to another person and it was not said that the alleged copy of the Eighteen Power of Attorney was issued in favor of duplication, nor any oath of transfer mentioned in support of the claim for disposal of the plot. The name was kept. On receipt of the respondent's letter regarding the cancellation of the matter by the plaintiff, the plaintiff sent a reply to the defendants and also published notices in the newspapers and collections regarding the total unanimous pricing of the plots under the direction of the courts. The balance amount, which shows that the plaintiff is ready and willing to pay his share of the contract, so the plaintiff was successful in settling the first case and, as an interim injunction, was requested, not granted. Gone, it would have incurred irreparable harm, so it was claimed as a prayer, so, the case was handed over to the plaintiff until the final dismissal. Or criminal advocate from Rajanpur lawyer