Termination of Articles 3 and 7 of the Pakistan Essential Services (Rehabilitation) Act, 1952, against the petitioners working in the Establishment, claimed that at the time their services were terminated they were operating under the Act and their applications were granted. Dismissed by the deputy commissioner as a competent officer under section 7 of the Action, while approving the constitutional petition filed by the petitioner against the order of the dye commissioner, the petitioners stand that 1989 In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case reported as SCMR 1549, the petitioner also sought their remedy. They can approach the Labor Court. At the request of the applicants, their constitutional petition was rejected as they would freely withdraw and refer to the relevant Labor Court, which is available to them under the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
