DIVISIONAL TRANSPORTATION OFFICER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Publicity City Order Petitioner was challenged by a complaint request that during the post of applicant, the respondent was promoted while the applicant was dismissed by the Labor Court. However, the suspension of the respondents' development order was issued and the applicant's order of detention is the order of the respondent's development, any order was appropriate in the absence of a subpoena and the petitioner has been returned and the respondent. Has been promoted, in the absence of any order to the contrary, the applicant's significant request for wrongful conviction Was. And even after such publicity and demolition, the steel order could not be issued under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Kashmore lawyer