Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), section 397 burglary or attempted burglary or attempt to cause death or injury; The complainant refused to file an FIR for the incident that was fired on the police, after which the complainant filed a petition before the Justice of Peace, which was allowed and eventually the FIR was registered against the accused. I was nominated by the complainant in connection with the robbery and special role of the fire incident, the complainant in the FIR registration The delay was explained by the fact that the complainant remained in the hospital for treatment, and the police refused to file an FIR after discharge. The medical evidence obtained shot through the complaint by medical evidence. Has been confirmed. The prosecution was dismissed for linking the accused to the commission of the alleged crime

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• MAZHARUDDIN SIDDIQUI v. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLD 998
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-V, LARGE TAXPAYER, KARACHI v. FARAN SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI 2014 PTD 999
• Mst. HAFEEZ BEGUM v. Mrs. ZAINAB MUHAMMAD ALI 2014 MLD 1000
• PAKISTAN BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION v. SARFARAZ HUSSAIN SHAH 2014 CLC 1002
• MUHAMMAD ALI ABBAS v. Syed HASSAN RAZA RIZVI 2014 CLC 1006
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID SIDDIQUI v. MUHAMMAD MANZAR ALAM QADRI 2014 CLD 1010
• AL AMNA INTERNATIONAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue 2014 PTD 1011
• Prof. Dr. MASOOD HAMEED KHAN v. GOVERNOR OF SINDH through Principal Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 1014

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bhakkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes