Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION versus SARFARAZ HUSSAIN SHAH

Section 3 Interim Interim Intervention by the Court of Appeal Court Generally, the appellate court does not interfere with the interim order rendered during the trial, in the present case, the single judge of the High Court, without hearing the petition on the merits. Orders were approved. Justification was not granted In the High Court of Appeal, the interim order was set up and the single judge was directed to decide all pending applications and accordingly the appeal was disposed of.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• MUHAMMAD RASHEED v. Mst. SAEEDA BANO 2014 CLC 990
• MAZHARUDDIN SIDDIQUI v. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLD 998
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-V, LARGE TAXPAYER, KARACHI v. FARAN SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI 2014 PTD 999
• Mst. HAFEEZ BEGUM v. Mrs. ZAINAB MUHAMMAD ALI 2014 MLD 1000
• SHAHZAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1002
• MUHAMMAD ALI ABBAS v. Syed HASSAN RAZA RIZVI 2014 CLC 1006
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID SIDDIQUI v. MUHAMMAD MANZAR ALAM QADRI 2014 CLD 1010
• AL AMNA INTERNATIONAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue 2014 PTD 1011

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

registration advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes