Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-V, LARGE TAXPAYER, KARACHI versus FARAN SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI

Referring to the High Court's jurisdiction under Section 34A of the Federal Excise Act, Section 3, while using only those questions using jurisdiction under section 34A of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 Only the High Court could give the answers which were questions of law. And the Appellate Tribunal's order that any external arguments or matters should be raised before the High Court for the first time in such a manner that it gives the impression that such a question is a question of law, cannot even be considered. ? Under the limited jurisdiction established by the High Court under section 34A of the Federal Excise Act, 2005

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE v. PAK ARAB PIPE LINE COMPANY LTD. 2014 PTD 982
• ELBOW ROOM v. MCB BANK LIMITED 2014 CLD 985
• MUHAMMAD RASHEED v. Mst. SAEEDA BANO 2014 CLC 990
• MAZHARUDDIN SIDDIQUI v. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLD 998
• Mst. HAFEEZ BEGUM v. Mrs. ZAINAB MUHAMMAD ALI 2014 MLD 1000
• PAKISTAN BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION v. SARFARAZ HUSSAIN SHAH 2014 CLC 1002
• SHAHZAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1002
• MUHAMMAD ALI ABBAS v. Syed HASSAN RAZA RIZVI 2014 CLC 1006

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

best advocate from Jehanian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes