PROF. DR. MASOOD HAMEED KHAN versus GOVERNOR OF SINDH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Article 12 of the Constitution, Article 199 Civil Service Appointment Against the Vice-Chancellor's Office and Closing Transaction Discrimination Amendment, under which the term of the Vice-Chancellor is three consecutive terms. The Vice Chancellor, who was the Vice-Chancellor of the University for more than two terms at the commencement of the amendment of the Act, was added to two consecutive terms and one imposition that the applicant enjoyed two terms of office. As Vice-Chancellor and appointed for the third term as such, which was based on the amendment of Section 12 of the Dow University Health Sciences Act, 2004, the applicant's position was that after his appointment An entitlement was created in favor of it and it was past and closed, which could not be reopened on the basis of the amendment of the State, with regard to the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor with the foregoing effect on the review of past and closed transactions. The philosophy or point of view was not applicable but for the third term he, as Vice-Chancellor, was claiming that he was continuing. The term or job is not complete. The third term could not be treated as in the past, and the legislature amended it to ensure that no one would enjoy a third term as Vice-Chancellor for a period of twelve years. Will create frustration and frustration in the people. Eligible to be Vice-Chancellor, but in the present case, the Vice-Chancellor did not want to leave his position as his successor in the interest of his ability to hold this long and long term job of a person in a particular position or position.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
