Sections 9 (c), 34, 35 and 36 were recovered from the testimony of the accused by the evidence that the chemical analysis was not performed in accordance with the law in which the alleged laboratory produced by the alleged test prosecution The report violates the law's mandate, because the laboratory was not informed by the federal or provincial government for industrial analysis, even by litigation. Nor was any laboratory official reported as an analyst. Such a report submitted by the prosecution cannot be made the basis for conviction under Section 9 (c) of the Code of Conduct Act, 1997, which states that six pairs of bags were recovered from the litigation. Out of 40 and six grams were never sent for chemical analysis, the recovered material was never sealed, so fresh samples could not be drawn from the rest of the matter, as no residue from the residual substances. Can't attach what had been reportedly lying in the authorities' warehouse for more than five years and that too in a non-sealed condition. The court set aside the conviction and sentence given to the accused and acquitted him of the charges
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
