MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus PREMIER AGGLOW INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED.
Section 151 and AXXII, R3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 suits the court for the exception of defendant's inherent powers for the specific performance of the contract, in which the plaintiff plaintiff sued But one of the legal heirs transferred the application. For the refund of the banquet given by his father to the defendant, the praying for the refund of the weak was beyond the scope of the inherent powers under section 151, color suit for the specific performance of the CPC The change could not be enhanced. The claim for a refund was not executed on the plaintiff's legal heritage, nor was any request moved for it. No material was on record as to whether the applicant was the legal heir of the deceased or the legal heir of the deceased. No one was allowed by the heirs to claim the defendant's refund from the court through the applicant / the outstanding amount, if that money was non-refundable, the legal heirs could not be returned at this time. Unless they believe E has implemented the case or they have prepared a succession certificate that the money A succession certificate has been submitted for you to claim because the request for a refund is pending
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
