Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 9 (a) and (b) definition of drug containing evidence, the reduction of convicted charges stated that in this case, the High Court reduced the sentence already passed while maintaining the conviction, the accused immediately appealed. Will not strain the sample. Prepared for chemical examination, represents the recovery of marijuana up to 10 grams from the accused. The accused was over 60 years old, with no previous record recorded. Since 2006, it has tolerated long appeals.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• AWAL RAEF v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1075
• Chaudhary MUHAMMAD YASEEN v. ABID WASEEM 2014 MLD 1078
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. PREMIER AGGLOW INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED. 2014 CLC 1080
• Dr. ABDUL WAHAB v. SAMEENA MAQSOOD 2014 MLD 1086
• JAMIL AHMAD BUTT v. The STATE through Prosecutor-General, Sindh 2014 PCrLJ 1093
• FOUNDATION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, KARACHI v. COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, KARACHI 2014 PTD 1094
• BASHIR AHMED MIRZA v. KAMALUDDIN ALVI 2014 YLR 1097
• PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LIMITED v. AJMA CORPORATION LIMITED 2014 CLD 1097

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

list of supreme court advocates from Sherani lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes