Find a Lawyer

PANDURANG RAMCHANDRA MANDLIK versus SAHANTABAI RAMCHANDRA GHATGE

R4 (1) (b) Police Service of Pakistan (Formation and Cadre) Rules 1985, R7 All Pakistan Services (Rename) Rules, 1973 Maintenance Notification No. 10/4/87 E3 (Police) established in 1973 Do, dated 7 10 1987 Senior Appellant, as Superintendent of Police, was expected to be enforced in the Police Group of All Pakistan Unified Grade (APUG) from 24 197 1975, from the day he was Superintendent of Police ( Grade 18), but they were included in the police group, which took effect on 23 7 1985 and the appellant prayed about his arrest in the police group and asked the respondents for his superiority. Was made and the provincial government recommended the appellant's name and it was approved for promotion as the Superintendent of Police. Grade 18, however, did not consider his development to join the police group because the appellant and many other officers of the provincial police service were considered to have advanced the course in the course of the case and thereby proceeded. Was not done Neither the selection board, nor the length of service nor the applicant's experience was considered and the Appellant's case was implemented along with many other officers and was not considered suitable for development at one stage. And it was cleared in the second phase and developed from the history of the space. In the quota of provincial police officers, promotion of the appellant as the superintendent of police in grade 18 was not indicated in the police group and there was no case of encroachment in the police group which was converted into police service under the Police Group of Police. , Cadre and seniority) advocate for immigration from Kot Addu lawyer