Find a Lawyer

RAFIQ AHMAD TALWAD versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, LAHORE DIVISION, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS

Railroad Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1961 R4 Accused Appellant Railway employees were accused of presenting themselves as having a pass to be removed from the job even though it was not in fact. Having a pass, which was one of the passwords that was left unused in the book, was lost in the pass section of the D-section office and using the same. The acquisition of the PTO in question and the pass and the PTO were both fraudulently prepared and used by the fake names. And the inquiry officer was removed from the job after the appellant was found guilty in his report. ??? Detecting the offender, he revealed that the appellant failed to appeal before the defendant despite numerous occasions. Due to the absence of the appellant, the inquiry officer suggested earlier that action could be taken against him under the rules, but there was no doubt in the inquiry officer's report that his action had made everything necessary. There was no record made by the inquiry officer. Although the evidence against the appellant was legally binding and he made no attempt to obtain the witnesses' presence, the inquiry officer's finding against the appellant resulted in an unlawful delay at the end of the disciplinary proceedings. ? The Justice and the Department were unable to provide any explanation for the abortion on the appellant's delay in holding that the `authority 'and` competent officer' in his case were not properly dismissed by the Department. Find the appellant best law firm from Diamer lawyer