SHAHID M. AKHTAR versus CHAIRMAN, WAPDA, LAHORE
West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act 1958 Section 17 (1A) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Removal of employees of the same establishment was charged with corruption in the record of the same type. Was that different officers were treated differently. In the category of such irregularities, regardless of whether each of them harmed the authority, which clearly presented a clear case of discrimination, no law, regulation, or anything, was allowed. What can be done, which is not the same? Applied discrimination is rooted in justice and eliminates the ill will, corruption and arbitrariness brought to their notice, fair and discriminating of all things. , With the result that such malaria is shown in a variety of behaviors. Establishment employees would be entitled to snatch the legal status of defamation proceedings and relief orders to the affected person. Thus, the dismissal of the sanctioned service against the employees of the Establishment was denied, illegal and illegal removal orders were issued. , Along with the directive that employees be reinstated with all consequential benefits from the date of removal, except for payment of salaries. From this date until the date of the announcement of the decision of the Service Tribunal, which will be considered as an extraordinary leave, without pay.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer