Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF KHATRI versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

The Section 18 post-appellant upgrade, which is acting as a reader in the Sindh Labor Appellate Tribunal (B11), was being demanded to be equal to the High Court Reader, whose position the government upgraded to the B16 package. Which was with the Services and General Administration Department. The Department of Finance recommended twice the applicant's case for the upgrade of the post, but the Treasury refused to follow the proposal of a written statement stating that the Department of Finance rejected the proposal. The only reason for weighing was that the reader was placed in the Punjab Labor Appellate Tribunal B 11, if one or the other province denied the benefits to its staff members, then it would go to the Finance Department or another government department. In any case, the decision will not serve as the basis for decision-making, but rather the department should go into the merits and matters of the case. Oh, and then come to my end, the position of a Labor Appellate Tribunal headed by a retired or working judge of the High Court. By no means less than the High Court and the Reader's Tribunal was it entitled to be equal to the readers of the High Court's Reader of Labor Appeal Tribunal, Vas was ordered to increase from B11 to B16. immigration advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer