Find a Lawyer

BAQAR ALI KHAN versus THE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment Promotion and Exchange) Rules 1974 R8 Sindh (Gazette) Civil Servants (National Scale of Pay) Rules 1974, R9 (1) BS18 Joint Director's salary Appellant's promotion and regularity of the Tudunan. Promoted to the newly created post of the same post, but with the recommendation of the Provincial Selection Board in BS 19, the salary of the Development Applicant remained the same as he was drawing before joining the top post of BS 19, the deployment of salary. Not satisfied with this, the appellant submitted a new scale of representation to represent that he was permanently promoted to the higher position. Accordingly, the salary of the appellant was rejected on the ground that his inclusion in the higher office was merely a gradation of the post and was not in the nature of development. Inclusion in pay scale (BS 19) was treated because the issues related to the Rule 8 were not advertised through outreach. Appointment of appellant as joint director in BS 19 would be considered as promotion, the eight year rule for his rule was clearly a promotion and thus his salary in BS 19 was R9. (1). online advocate from Skardu lawyer