Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus CHIEF ENGINEER, COORDINATION (WATER), WAPDA

Appellant dismissing Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1978, R2 (3), acting as timekeeper in Mechanized Construction of Pakistan (time workshop) Was fired from the job. Wapda pleaded guilty to wrongful use of the Wapda and even deposited the wrong amount in acknowledgment of criminal misappropriation of the money, and in order to apologize, the appellant also rejected Wapda's rule that it was Wapda's rules. Applying the rules, he claims he was not one. The Wapda and West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, employed them in their case, which was a Mechanized Construction of Pakistan (Equipments Workshop), a unit of the WAPDA, under the authority of the Federal Government. There was a moving establishment. Where legal rules of service, conduct and discipline were in force, the provisions of the Ordinance VI of the Employees and the 1968 Act did not apply, the orders against the appellant were adopted by a competent authority adopting the prescribed procedure and rules. advocate from Lasbela lawyer