Find a Lawyer

RANA JAWAID IQBAL versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SIND

The Appellant dismissing the Appellant dismissing the Applicants of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Police Rules, 1934, RR 16 22 and 16 24, absent a felony without a prior employment dismissal or corruption conviction. Is punished. Before the Deputy Inspector General of Police failed and he filed another appeal before the Inspector General of Police instead of pursuing his further appeal with the Service Tribunal, though he had no other appeal before the Department Authority. Was not right, it turns out that his appeal lies before the service tribunal. He was banned at that time and was subject to dismissal on this basis because the time taken by the appellant to treat him, before the inspector general had not been declared legally satisfactory to the police. The order on the first appeal was to be finalized and if the appellant's second appeal against the appellant of this final order was still required to be filed with the service tribunal, like a review before the Inspector General. Was to be treated, even banned from filing his appeal before the Appellant Service Tribunal. Dog until after the review of the appellant had no reasonable excuse for the delay in filing appeal before the Appeal Tribunal service. Excluded as a restriction of circumstance inheritance advocates near Thari Mirwah lawyer