Section 497 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 26 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 13 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420 and 489F Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Fraud and Prohibition Promoting the transfer of property illegally, issuing fraudulent checks, criminal mismanagement, simultaneous denial of legal proceedings which creates scope double risk in one case, scope double risk, which serves as senior position in the bank. , Allegedly appealed to the complainant to make some money in the bank for better (as usual) profit, the complainant complained to the receiver and under his signature Issued the receipts on the bank's letter pad afterwards the accused could not fulfill his commitment and in return issued a fake check to the complainant with his account, which was insulted due to insufficient funds (current ) The FIR was filed under Section 420, section 489F read with Section 5 (2) of the PPC, a separate FIR under section 489F, PPC under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 A separate FI was also lodged against the accused, despite the fact that crimes were committed in the same transaction. This law requires only one trial for offenses committed by the same transaction. And that under section 26 of the General Clause Act, 1897, separate civil proceedings were also initiated in the form of a recovery case in connection with the verification of the offense, there was no restriction on the simultaneous litigation. What was forbidden was a duplicate sentence and would not pose a double risk in FI rupees, not just trial, both facts of the FI are quite different.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
