BASHIR AHMED MUGHAL versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Sections 3 (2) and 6 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 4 (4), 42 (4) and 43 (2A) of the AJJ Shariat Court Judges Appointment of Judicial Freedom Judges Appointment of Shariat Court, Chief Justice of Azad Jammu and Kashmir without advisor to Azad Jammu and Kashmir and support of the Constitution of Chief Justice of the Shariat Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Accepted constitutional clauses, the basic essence and spirit in all constituencies of civilized states is the establishment of an independent Shariah court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and its jurisdiction under the provisions of AJ. According to the car there was access to justice. And by the Kashmir Shariah Court Act, 1993 or any other law, the justice system had a major role to play in the administration. Its jurisdiction and jurisdiction was directly and indirectly related to the guaranteed fundamental rights of the Shariat Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, therefore, its independence was constitutionally required, the nature of the judicial duties of the Shariah Court. According to this, it was an important judicial institution for the purpose of the administration of justice and according to the spirit and scheme of the Constitution, its complete independence was essential to achieve and maintain the independent status of the judicial organs (appointment of the judiciary). The procedure was very important and without following this procedure. According to the Constitution for an independent judiciary that was needed, no court could be set up to jointly characterize the constitution of different countries of the world, whether democratic or undemocratic, whether the appointment was made in consultation with the judiciary or on recommendations? Consisting of the Chief Justice of the respective institutions, or the judge of the country, or just
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015
