Find a Lawyer

SHAFQAT ULLAH versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, F.IA.

The dismissal appellant, an FIA inspector, was dismissed as a charge that he and other FIA personnel arrested two men in connection with a criminal case filed at the FIA Center. He was detained for the night and released only after he was released. A substantial amount of the Inquiry Officer's statement, which states that the allegations have been thoroughly investigated, and various orders by the authorities indicate that the action against the appellant was done without prejudice or prejudice and that the appeal. There was hardly any substance that was provoked by the stimulants. Inquiries that he illegally released to release two detained men. The criminal proceedings against the appellant were dismissed on technical grounds that the sanction of legal proceedings against the appellant was defective, but the prosecution against them resulted in the termination of their employment. No court stood in the way of the court proceedings in the courtroom. The officer and the officer authorized to remove the appellant from the job, but the Director General, the FIA, dismissed them in accordance with the orders for dismissal and discipline, Demanded without any interference and said that appeals against this order were dismissed by government employees (talent and discipline). (Rolls, 1973, R4) jobs for fresh advocates from Lalshanra lawyer