Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAID AHMAD KHAN versus PAKISTAN

Basic Rules R14A (A) Line Appellant, who was UDC (B7) on the permanent power of staff in the Office of the Director Telegraph and Telephone Audit, was sent to the Department of Budget and Accounts Deposit at the Pakistan PwD Office. Went: Appellant's parents demand consent from officials, including appellant, if they are willing to return to their parents' department, they are offered promotion to a higher position because appellant's accounts in B11 The assistant gave his consent, but after his promotion, which was legally made and his return home, The orders were issued by a competent authority. On the approval of the Departmental Promotion Committee, the lending department refused to disclose the diamond to join the parent department. There was nothing available to show that it was so and neither was the fact that the post transfer was mentioned in the appellant's services order to dispose of the loan subsidy. The key and non-preliminary evidence was on record, which shows that his parents Was not appealing user rights hkmh nor it has been verified that the appellant hack into the Department of Department of saline and was thus entitled to the department. There was no question of termination of the appellant's right in his parent's department, the orders of the lender's department not to dismiss the appellant were invalidated, the appellant in his result being the accountant's superior in B11. best law firms from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer