Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI versus MEMBER, ADMINISTRATION, CORPORATE LAW AUTHORITY,GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R4 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Mandatory Retirement Government employee has been falsely accused of duty absentee government employees for this reason. The retirement order emphasized that the full requirements of the rules were not met. The inquiry officer's action, either by an authorized officer or by an authorized authority, did not constitute a mistake as either the authorized officer or some of the procedures authorized by the authorized authority to terminate the disapproval order Was also found to be incorrect. The other showcase notice was legally incorrect, which was sent to the public employee with the inquiry officer's report when it was temporarily decided that he would be punished for his termination of employment. Was ordered and ordered to retire from his job was not in any way, nor did he disobey and violate the principles of natural justice of the illegal or abusive civil servant absent from the position of public servant without any justification. The fact was that relying on the certificate from the private doctor was of no use Luff has been absent from his position on occasions, long term, without leave and that his willful absence was clearly a disregard for office discipline, which included gross mismanagement, such as disciplinary proceedings and employment. The final decree of retirement was justified top civil advocates from Bajaur lawyer